After Putin gave Trump a painting (with many meanings), the possibility of redolling became a topic of interest, and he also proposed a temporary ceasefire in Ukraine. The recent cooperative measures between Putin and Trump, including the president receiving portraits from Russian leaders, at this point raise questions about how such a US-Russian axis will affect the currency dynamics between reconstruction and the ongoing derailment.


Could Putin’s ceasefire proposal and the US-Russia axis lead to redoling or derailing?
Putin’s Strategic Overture

President Putin announced a three-day ceasefire from May 8-10 yesterday, coinciding with the celebration of the victory of World War II. This diplomatic gesture comes as analysts are considering the impact of global currency trends, including potential redrolling scenarios.
The Kremlin said:
“All military operations have been suspended for a period of time. Russia believes that the Ukrainian side should follow this example.”
President Zelensky questioned the timing and said:
“For some reason, everyone is supposed to wait for May 8th, then we will have a ceasefire to ensure Putin gently during the parade. We value people’s lives, not the parade.”

Impact on Trump Putin’s relationship

The US and Russia axis shows signs of warming, but tensions remain undoubtedly lingering on Ukraine and related issues. The gift of portraits symbolizes Putin’s outreach to Trump in ceasefire talks and diplomatic efforts that could affect currency preferences and trends in recombination.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff James Blair revealed in a recent statement.
“(Trump) is very unhappy with the attacks on civilian regions last week, and (Trump’s) will be placed on the table that will increase sanctions, secondary tariffs on oil, whatever they need to hurry up and get to the table and create peace.”
Financial impact: redrol or deco-op?
The potential US and Russian axes raise important questions about redrol and ongoing derailment at this point. Will the close ties strengthen the dollar in bilateral trade, or will the two countries continue to pursue alternative financial systems and structures?
George Barros of the War Institute pointed out in his analysis:
“The Kremlin is now explicitly requesting everything from Kherson and Zaporizhia, which were not part of the 2021 request.
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov argued for key concessions, saying:
“We also argue for the acquisition of a robust security guarantee from the Russian Federation to protect it from any threats arising from hostile activities by NATO, the European Union and some of our member states along our western border.”
The outcome of these negotiations and diplomatic exchanges will likely determine whether we are seeing a shift towards redolling decooperative in the global financial system in the future.